Key Points
- Exclusion from Political Party: The political party Reform UK has officially excluded Newcastle city councillor Daniel Astley immediately due to his undisclosed past association with the banned far-right Homeland Party.
- Political Affiliation: Councillor Astley, who was elected to Newcastle city council in May 2026 representing the Benwell, Scotswood, and Denton Burn ward, has been recategorized into an independent on the official Newcastle City Council website.
- Inflammatory Statements and Apology: The archived tweets of a deleted X (earlier known as Twitter) account affiliated with Councillor Astley contain discriminatory remarks, including telling independent MP Adnan Hussain to go back to his country, along with sweeping generalizations against Muslims. Councillor Astley made a public apology regarding his inflammatory statements.
- Controversy in Council Chamber: The exclusion came after the backlash from Councillor Astley’s comments at the municipal debate, where he seemed to support demographic replacement ideas about West Road in Newcastle.
- Criticism of the Opposition: Deputy Leader of Liberal Democrats, Mark Mitchell, has criticized the vetting process of Reform UK as Councillor Astley’s association with Homeland Party was clearly evident on the Electoral Commission website and social media platforms before his election.
Newcastle (New Castle Time) September 14, 2026 – A Newcastle city councillor has been dramatically expelled from Reform UK following mounting scrutiny over undisclosed ties to a proscribed far-right organization, alongside a trail of controversial anti-Muslim social media commentary and contentious remarks made during a municipal council debate.
Councillor Daniel Astley, who was elected in May 2026 to represent the tri-ward area of Benwell, Scotswood, and Denton Burn, has had his party membership terminated with immediate effect. Following his swift removal from the populist party’s ranks, municipal authorities moved to update the official Newcastle City Council directory, reclassifying Councillor Astley as an independent representative.
The decisive action by party officials came only hours after the local branch had publicly defended the embattled representative, framing external criticism as “politically motivated nonsense”. However, the discovery of his unstated background as a senior official within the nationalist Homeland Party—a group explicitly banned under internal Reform UK candidate guidelines—prompted an immediate reversal by local leadership.
Why Was Councillor Daniel Astley Expelled by Reform UK?
As reported by Local Democracy Reporter Daniel Holland of the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), Steven Rutherford, the leader of the Reform UK opposition group on Newcastle City Council, confirmed that the primary driver behind the sudden termination was Councillor Astley’s undisclosed history with the far-right Homeland Party.
In an official public statement detailing the internal disciplinary decision, Steven Rutherford stated:
“As Leader of Reform UK in Newcastle, I confirm that we have taken the decision to expel Councillor Daniel Astley from Reform UK with immediate effect. Coun Astley has done some great work for residents during his time representing the area. We recognise and appreciate the efforts he has made.”
Continuing his explanation of the party’s statutory code, Steven Rutherford added:
“However, we were made aware of his links to the Homeland Party which he did not declare when he applied to be a candidate. The Homeland Party is a proscribed group under Reform UK rules. Membership of, or links to, such groups is incompatible with remaining a member of Reform UK.”
Addressing the ongoing representation of local constituents in the wake of the expulsion, Steven Rutherford further noted:
“The other Reform UK ward councillors for Benwell, Scotswood and Denton Burn will continue to represent residents and deliver for the local community. This decision has been taken to uphold the integrity of our local party and the standards we expect of all representatives.”
What Social Media Posts Triggered Public Outrage?
The political fallout surrounding Councillor Astley intensified significantly following disclosures regarding activity on a now-deleted account on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) bearing his name. Archived digital records recovered from the account revealed a series of inflammatory remarks directed at minority groups and political figures.
In one prominent interaction, the account instructed independent Member of Parliament Adnan Hussain to “p*** off back to Pakistan”. Additional postings retrieved from the archive contained severe anti-Muslim generalizations, including claims asserting that
“we don’t want Muslims in our country because they rape white English girls and commit terrorist attacks”.
Furthermore, media reviews of the deleted social media account revealed explicit calls advocating for the “mass emigration of non-Europeans, Muslims, Africans etc.”. Digital archives also revealed that the profile previously designated Councillor Astley as a national nominating officer for the Homeland Party—a political organization whose stated platform advocates for the removal of more than 10 million migrants to counter demographic changes.
Explore More Newcastle Council News
Council Plans £600k Upgrade for Knutton Lane Waste Depot, Newcastle-under-Lyme 2026
Reform UK Demands Debate Over Newcastle Housing Deal In Newbiggin Hall 2026
How Did Councillor Astley Respond to the Social Media Disclosures?
Prior to his official expulsion, Councillor Astley sought to mitigate the growing controversy through formal statements provided to national and local news agencies.
As initially reported in The Times, Councillor Astley issued a formal public apology acknowledging the offense caused by his historical postings. In his written statement, Councillor Astley stated that he wished to “retract all previous social media comments” and explicitly affirmed his underlying support for constitutional freedom of religion.
In a subsequent statement provided directly to Local Democracy Reporter Daniel Holland of the LDRS, Councillor Astley addressed his former affiliation with the Homeland Party and clarified his political history:
“On the Homeland Party, I do not accept the characterisation of ‘extremist’ given, as mentioned, I believe their policies at the time to have been very close to Reform’s policies now. I have not had any contact with them since last year, I have never worked on policy, attended a conference or organised elections for them.”
Elaborating on his trajectory within electoral politics, Councillor Astley explained that he had previously resigned from Reform UK before opting to rejoin the party prior to the municipal elections. He noted that his decision to rejoin occurred after Reform UK formally committed to “retrospectively removing illegal migrants” and “overseeing net negative migration”. Following the public announcement of his expulsion, Councillor Astley was approached for further comment regarding his future on the council.
What Happened During the Newcastle City Council Debate on West Road?
The disciplinary action by Reform UK follows a week of heated political debate inside Newcastle City Council chambers. The dispute originated during a council session centered on a Green Party-led motion designed to officially reject “far-right narratives of division” and affirm community cohesion.
During floor debate on the motion, Councillor Astley drew strong criticism from rival political factions after delivering remarks regarding local demographics on Newcastle’s West Road. Critics accused the councillor of endorsing the “Great Replacement” conspiracy theory—an ideological belief alleging a coordinated effort to replace native European populations with non-white immigrants.
Addressing the council chamber during the session, Councillor Astley stated that the Green Party motion:
“…attempts to dismiss demographic replacement as some kind of conspiracy theory, despite the national census data or quick walk down the West Road suggesting otherwise.”
How Did Councillor Astley Defend His Council Chamber Remarks?
Following immediate condemnation from opposition council members, Councillor Astley submitted a clarifying statement to Local Democracy Reporter Daniel Holland of the LDRS prior to his expulsion. In his response, Councillor Astley firmly denied subscribing to racial conspiracy theories.
In his statement to the LDRS, Councillor Astley asserted that he “wholeheartedly” rejected the Great Replacement theory, maintaining that his comments were intended strictly to highlight verifiable, evolving demographic trends rather than promote fringe ideologies.
How Have Other Political Figures and Parties Reacted?
The disclosure of Councillor Astley’s historic social media posts and political affiliations triggered swift condemnation from across Newcastle’s political spectrum.
As reported by Daniel Holland for the LDRS, Liberal Democrat Councillor Mark Mitchell, who serves as the Deputy Leader of Newcastle City Council, launched a critical attack against Reform UK’s handling of the candidate selection process and the party’s initial defense of Councillor Astley.
Speaking on behalf of the Liberal Democrat administration, Deputy Leader Mark Mitchell called on Reform UK to:
“…apologise for continuing to defend him and condemn his inflammatory comments about the communities of the West Road.”
Addressing the systemic vetting failures alleged within the opposition party, Deputy Leader Mark Mitchell added:
“Once again, Reform are hiding behind failed vetting processes, claiming they didn’t know that Coun Astley was a former member of the far right Homeland Party, despite him proudly proclaiming it on social media and being listed as a senior national officer on the Electoral Commission website before the May elections.”
What Is the Current Political Standing on Newcastle City Council?
With the formal termination of his party membership, Councillor Daniel Astley becomes an independent member of Newcastle City Council, representing the Benwell, Scotswood, and Denton Burn ward without party affiliation. Reform UK’s local leadership confirmed that its remaining ward representatives will continue their municipal duties under the party banner, as political figures across the city digest the fallout from the vetting lapse.
